Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.37 as permitted sender)
From: Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com>
To: "dev@felix.apache.org" <dev@felix.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:22:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [DS] State of the bundle and ready for a release ?
Thread-Topic: [DS] State of the bundle and ready for a release ?
Thread-Index: Ac2GZw+VC2ciF0QATkyG1xRCgkCdcA==
Message-ID: <C25EB443-F563-4E88-A816-8B3736EEE799@adobe.com>
References: <5FC1365A-8FD3-43F4-BC99-69259541BC7F@adobe.com>
 <5187D121-0D35-44A2-9889-823D60FE7049@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <5187D121-0D35-44A2-9889-823D60FE7049@yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi,

Am 29.08.2012 um 22:11 schrieb David Jencks:

> I think I understand the cause of the currently known concurrency problem=
s and hope to fix them in the next few days.  If we don't see new problems =
for a week or so I'd be very happy to go for a 1.8.0 release.  I'm not so t=
hrilled about releasing the current code as it has an infrequent but major =
concurrency problem and also has a bunch of logging not really suitable for=
 production to try to elucidate those concurrency problems.  Fortunately th=
e logging finally worked :-)

Understood. I would actually prefer to keep the additional logging in. We m=
ight degrade the level to DEBUG and even surround with "if (isDebugEnabled)=
" statements.

>=20
> I'm not sure how we could figure out an earlier version we'd like to rele=
ase without all the DS 1.2 and proposed 1.3 features.

My goal is for DS 1.2 completeness first and have it released.

As for the currently proposed extensions (RFP 151, http://www.osgi.org/bugz=
illa/show_bug.cgi?id=3D147), I think we already have most of them (with the=
 notable exception of the admin API which is slightly different than today'=
s API).

>=20
> Are you aware of any DS 1.2 features we haven't implemented yet?  I have =
not yet figured out how to run the CTS, the packaging seems to have changed=
 a bit since the instructions were written.

Ok, I will see, what is missing. And I can also run the CT.

>=20
> thanks!

Also, thanks ;-)

Regards
Felix

> david jencks
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Aug 29, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>=20
>> Hi all,
>>=20
>> I saw quite some activity again recently around DS. I wonder what the st=
ate currently is and whether we should head for an early release before goi=
ng into another round of fixes.
>>=20
>> I could imagine, we'd do a 1.6.2 release instead of 1.8.0 and do the 1.8=
.0 release once we are complete with the implementation of the latest DS sp=
ec and the current concurrency issues.
>>=20
>> WDYT ?
>>=20
>> Regards
>> Felix
>=20