Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6C039961 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 05:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9088 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 05:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 8986 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 05:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 8954 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2012 05:55:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 05:55:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.55] (HELO smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.55) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 05:55:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 74269 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2012 05:55:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=A6y3aCa0CatyzbEbPm3U8h6RIGF7cnGF6USwMVIbpGicCCWpW1ekcgre6gEAt7SPhdBn4LaKoEULkFqIwj7DpLm7Wjdz5N8ICyeyphcQYEqORILOfcl8JKm/HRckXRdEb8B9g2P9GPfeYGRauFWyp/voZahlWxp9TjjHEO3yC40= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1332395713; bh=2hX8S3tsvLb7voy0ECeFneEaOwyLLqXaiBhHqStdomM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=lnyy4BvXrG3kJ4xFlaHBlHbmfMy86hIcXvl781Fi9+md1j3/JKNRg99xit3rAvI0ZL2ZiUbuXFOQ0Dv9dkpYDeM4lZpdqftbDdSrCn1knOoDldfHjzCDbJZyj6GR2r0Yx8QLbpJS9e9PsHQJkHnStVWXXyqN5VzYz7yBXmSJBlY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: MBm8.P0VM1kSJETt1vroIe4Xg6IA1d2dowvlbZkBD4vI3wI 0PQ1FLIHmX8dEtSU4KxF.I5hTZLgSJ4.slHYKChMvXrxcFgQjXRGivhLX4on AoQc0Ig4I_V6CLurBbLFk.043_kbpOxyx4yj3V35fxurAXKec9n11FpkLF.b 4LK2PmlJtNbcVcdJqSeVzI1I169DIwwoxAiYHl3_WBdoNQxpWrUpi2W0lQ0m HdolqMqDVZnoxzp4nhJw4.P1RVUwGxkh5OFt1Lk_EdK4N0Vv79zRf.drnCQy AvIRLa4clBor3fL4NZ3q._7CMs4uf8fQOsQPu7V9G74XmujdpY7geM37OFzB 6OCCcxuzVypl36ULYfIwbkcZcXbMWY381obpfGuq69Nt8N0..Tunx8dGMI7c 7Y5LJUxLLKkxRrGy5ey8Y.G1_UB_FQuBlQnaRMcjc54xsVsOG1KpPzhA2cBD 4VauDjtl1uuN3_iU1teVjpUHV3Z_tYWoQqr0jbPHsgYLloyi.R3X44KwHMv4 KNUfE77MxBzTG2skaKwC5NbeF3JxjMYsfxzi8tLjFmC90Ivxigf_biGWuAGY xKpZsymjUsfyso3tm3geXXFlgHbQ9Au34JhGa9jPt30.5wXTPermYdoRcLjP gkUpsI1gj3fJodEWVuzpc3Gs2Ffn3lPeerrLINTltBmA0OGo1wQmoefx8mwy aYNXs1hlbyb0NO.qQIUYh2RxWaZ7p X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- Received: from [10.0.1.4] (david_jencks@98.246.196.64 with plain) by smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2012 22:55:13 -0700 PDT From: David Jencks Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-16--246289119 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.2.0 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:55:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: dev@felix.apache.org References: Message-Id: <1B3153E7-5EF1-414A-8C2A-DA374AB456B8@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-16--246289119 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The aries semantic versioning tool indicates that there have been no = changes in the org.apache.felix.fileinstall package since the 3.1.10 = release but the package version has changed from 3.1.10 to 3.2.0. If I understand the advice on semantically versioning bundle versions = the bundle version would be more correct with a micro increment. Since the bundle is exposing some interfaces I would think that using = semantic versioning would provide significant value for the package = versioning. If you want to try this for yourself there are instructions to help make = the plugin useful here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-757 I ran=20 mvn clean asv:check = -DoldArtifact=3Dorg.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.fileinstall:3.1.10 on the project bundle. thanks david jencks On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Given the number of improvements, I've chosen to upgrade to a new > minor release instead of a micro one. >=20 > Please take some time to test as there has been important improvements > that could (hopefully not) lead to regressions. >=20 > We solved 18 issues in this > = release:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=3D1= 2316135&styleName=3DHtml&projectId=3D12310100 > There are still 6 outstanding > = issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dt= rue&jqlQuery=3Dproject+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22File+Install%22+AND+= status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=3Dhide > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-091/ > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the = signatures: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh > Usage: > sh check_staged_release.sh 091 /tmp/felix-staging >=20 > Please vote to approve this release: >=20 > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >=20 > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com --Apple-Mail-16--246289119--