Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CA93B4B8 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1106 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 12:56:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 990 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 12:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 982 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 12:56:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:56:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of marcel.offermans@luminis.nl does not designate 194.109.24.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.109.24.35] (HELO smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:56:09 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.36] (planetmarrs.xs4all.nl [82.95.193.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q04CtiKV065347 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:55:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marcel.offermans@luminis.nl) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [WebConsole] Dropping 1.4 builds ? From: Marcel Offermans In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:55:44 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CCA39A1-8B43-467C-B688-0EE180CE7EB6@luminis.nl> References: <505CD586-69FF-4744-A693-96D031186043@luminis.nl> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner On Jan 4, 2012, at 13:44 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans: >> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before = we do, because it probably makes sense to align our decision with = theirs. >=20 > They will create two builds. This would be my option (c). That does make sense. How do they name and version these artifacts? I am a bit reluctant to ask, but how does this fit into the Maven pom, = and our whole release process? Greetings, Marcel