Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-28207-apmail-felix-dev-archive=felix.apache.org@felix.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2906C48DC
	for <apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri,  1 Jul 2011 16:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 59643 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 16:44:16 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59545 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 16:44:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@felix.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@felix.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.felix.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59536 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2011 16:44:16 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:44:16 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f177.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username cziegeler, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:44:15 +0000
Received: by iyn15 with SMTP id 15so4418992iyn.22
        for <dev@felix.apache.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.81.18 with SMTP id v18mr2949738ibk.42.1309538655032; Fri,
 01 Jul 2011 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.143.10 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <720327FE-E496-4827-94A9-64AEAF55508D@gmail.com>
References: <4E0DF220.30107@ungoverned.org>
	<31DA2B9E-3064-4BC3-ACC4-4E7A86C904D9@gmail.com>
	<CAKkCf4ouh=CfxAbKL8tMgJ_k_OMFKv_ogWHXK7jkgBsC4aHY9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<720327FE-E496-4827-94A9-64AEAF55508D@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:44:14 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAKkCf4rqyUtLid8WAh=O=BDsN1TMNnwQXHW6oaWsQ_7_QRpFxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should we produce both .zip and .tar.gz of the released project,
 or just .zip?
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It would be great if you can do that - I fear I won't have time before
end of next week

Regards
Carsten

2011/7/1 Stuart McCulloch <mcculls@gmail.com>:
> On 1 Jul 2011, at 17:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/1 Stuart McCulloch <mcculls@gmail.com>:
>>> As Richard says below, historically Felix releases included both .zip a=
nd .tar.gz of the project (these are the main things we vote on)
>>>
>>> But the latest Apache parent pom only produces a .zip of the project re=
lease by default - so recent releases have only included .zip
>>>
>>> However we can choose to have both by adding:
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0<properties>
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0<sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-tar<=
/sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>
>>> =A0 =A0</properties>
>>>
>>> To the Felix parent pom and deploying v2.1
>>>
>>
>> Yes, we should do this - this was what we discussed after the event admi=
n release suffering from the same problem.
>
> righto - are you planning to update/deploy the new parent pom or should I=
 do that?
>
>> Carsten
>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers, Stuart
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: "Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org>
>>>> Date: 1 July 2011 17:13:20 GMT+01:00
>>>> To: dev@felix.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Bundle Repository version 1.6.6
>>>> Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On 7/1/11 12:10, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>>> On 1 Jul 2011, at 15:59, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the same issue as the Event Admin (?) release, when switchin=
g to the new parent pom, we don't get a tar.gz project release, only a zip =
release. What did we decide here? Are we going to switch to only a zip rele=
ase?
>>>>> the default (in the parent Apache pom) is to only produce a zip relea=
se, but you can get both zip and tar by setting:
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0 <properties>
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-t=
ar</sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>
>>>>> =A0 =A0 </properties>
>>>>>
>>>>> so we could always add this to the parent Felix pom (and deploy a new=
 2.1? release of that) if people want both
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter to me, really, but we've always had both and now we =
only have one. So, it seems like we need to make a decision for consistency=
 purposes.
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
>>>>>> -> =A0richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/29/11 19:27, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We solved 4 issues in this release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =A0 =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?re=
set=3Dtrue&jqlQuery=3Dproject+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22bundlereposit=
ory-1.6.6%22
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are still several outstanding issues:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =A0 =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?re=
set=3Dtrue&jqlQuery=3Dproject+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Bundle+Reposit=
ory+%28OBR%29%22+AND+status+%3D+Open
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =A0 =A0https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache=
felix-008/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the=
 signatures:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =A0 =A0http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_rel=
ease.sh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Usage:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =A0 =A0sh check_staged_release.sh 008 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers, Stuart
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziegeler@apache.org
>
>



--=20
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org