Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:33:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <1866206393.6969.1308148427535.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1171663171.1082.1307896431794.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FELIX-2993) jnlp & felix.security
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049794#comment-13049794 ] 

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2993:
----------------------------------------

First of all, any security provider will be tied to a framework implementation, since it is by definition part of the framework (it's one of the framework layers). So, if we accept this fact, then there are two approaches for implementing it: 1) include it as part of the framework or 2) implement it as a separate optional framework extension. Since the great majority of people don't use security, then (2) sounds like the better [more modular] approach, which is what we've and what our book would recommend. ;-)

> jnlp & felix.security
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2993
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework Security
>            Reporter: Andrei Pozolotin
>
> original thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg10424.html

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira