Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66058 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 22:15:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 22:15:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 96053 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 96006 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 95998 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.109.24.38] (HELO smtp-vbr18.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:15:23 +0000 Received: from marrs.fritz.box (planetmarrs.xs4all.nl [82.95.193.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr18.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p23MF146079539 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:15:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marcel.offermans@luminis.nl) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Board report time From: Marcel Offermans In-Reply-To: <4D6FFF2B.40703@ungoverned.org> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:15:01 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4D6FFF2B.40703@ungoverned.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner On 3 Mar 2011, at 21:50 , Richard S. Hall wrote: > It is somewhat paltry, so hopefully other people can think of some = things I'm missing. Well, we could hire a good story teller to make it look better, but I = think it nicely sums up that we've been quite productive releasing = different bundles. Trying hard to think of things to say about the community, but I think = it is pretty stable now and working well. Nothing particular I feel = worth reporting to the board. > Related question, is it worthwhile to mention that Felix framework as = well as some other subprojects were included in the recently released = GlassFish 3.1? I definitely think it is! Greetings, Marcel