Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20886 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 14:40:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 14:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 22574 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 14:40:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 22498 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 14:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 22489 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 14:40:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:40:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org designates 69.89.21.11 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.89.21.11] (HELO cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com) (69.89.21.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:40:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 18582 invoked by uid 0); 4 Mar 2011 14:40:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host118.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.118) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 14:40:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=wXipcXwm076E2Tymge++P9MoURN4szky8Cd6X/mO4EeBJVuwChpDSUBpCAxi6+Bf/NdWZ7h85Jgbs+E9+JKSvyCe3k+8gnnRbuge3ubfVT6T7GPSfvl4jIeY6dcdG6iV; Received: from [99.62.222.230] (helo=heavyweight.glastender.com) by host118.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvWB7-0007Ms-6O for dev@felix.apache.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:40:25 -0700 Message-ID: <4D70F9D6.4000504@ungoverned.org> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:40:22 -0500 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: Board report time References: <4D6FFF2B.40703@ungoverned.org> <1299220863.4002.42.camel@meschbix> In-Reply-To: <1299220863.4002.42.camel@meschbix> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1027:host118.hostmonster.com:ungovern:ungoverned.org} {sentby:smtp auth 99.62.222.230 authed with heavy@ungoverned.org} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/4/11 1:41, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 20:50 +0000 schrieb Richard S. Hall: >> I've taken an initial pass at the board report: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FELIX/Board+Report+%282011-03%29 >> >> It is somewhat paltry, so hopefully other people can think of some >> things I'm missing. >> >> Related question, is it worthwhile to mention that Felix framework as >> well as some other subprojects were included in the recently released >> GlassFish 3.1? > Hehe, so its time to wear my company's hat ? Our very own products also > include the framework and other subprojects, of course ;-) > > Yet, I am somewhat unsure, whether the board report is the right place > to note this ... In Sling we have created a Wiki page [1] listing known > users of Sling and wo which we invite participation. > > How about something like this (in the community section): A number of > open source and commercial products are making use of the Apache Felix > framework and other subprojects. Details on. > > WDYT ? We already have that. My question was more about should we bring such things to the attention of the board in our report? -> richard > Regards > Felix > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/SLING/who-is-using-sling-.html > >