felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (FELIX-2662) [Gogo] Consider more fully qualified configuration property names
Date Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:05:47 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2662:
-----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: gogo.runtime-0.8.0)
                   gogo.shell-0.10.0

> [Gogo] Consider more fully qualified configuration property names
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2662
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Gogo Shell
>    Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.1
>            Reporter: Richard S. Hall
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: gogo.shell-0.10.0
>
>
> I am not sure if this applies to the other Gogo modules, but Gogo Shell uses configuration
property names like "gosh.args" and "gosh.home", but these should likely be more fully qualified
names. For the framework, we've typically used names like "felix.*" although one could argue
for "org.apache.felix.*"...I think the former is sufficient.
> For the precise names, it is not clear if they should be felix.gosh.args or felix.gogo.shell.args...I
assume if the runtime has config properties they would be felix.gogo.runtime.*... We just
need to think about this and make things consistent and meaningful.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message