Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18958 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 16:06:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 16:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 23383 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 16:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 23000 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 16:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 22987 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 16:06:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:06:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierre.derop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.177] (HELO mail-yx0-f177.google.com) (209.85.213.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:06:21 +0000 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so1551602yxm.22 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=psdvI/LZAj5fnvt8MMMJGUOrM3wOp8NwbjUIsXXUp64=; b=gL6nLwPv96Tk+Z8pUpTtCmTLm7GLpARmhpt785kEadjykyIl1FnaowaVncs7vN41I2 vYnSZG2bxIEvTqUA+VrJt3HJni8zAwQS5fdCUuyAsONd+DkzeDRdsbjWww8y/UIokD1o FNvVUOTB5ldTbU1BvAyviyBemnE2MCMdAPlqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YhLKF4vxHVh6/V/YVhVt5OEprMGZntn97xQldXQ9/nGiC8Ea8tpkICucIKxal9kAf0 fbyzKBXr2z32fK2TIr7yDnZ4nnJQWwa4ODcV3ljY3aDaD6qDn3GdtFzWCAiXXlp4Z1ty h7FQiGRNIwltg78xnk7n9eVPsiX8Dj9yb4ePc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.159.20 with SMTP id h20mr1264577ybe.404.1285949160738; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.202.12 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:06:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA605C4.60106@ungoverned.org> References: <4CA605C4.60106@ungoverned.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:06:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ClassLoader.getResources returns null when resources are not found ? From: Pierre De Rop To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf1a3ceccf2c0491905e3a --000e0cdf1a3ceccf2c0491905e3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 okay, thanks for the info. /pierre On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 10/1/10 11:55, Pierre De Rop wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> With latest release of fwk (3.0.3), I noticed that a bundle class loader >> "getResources" method is now returning null when resources are not found >> (instead of an empty enumeration). >> >> Am I correct ? in this case, is this a regression from FELIX-2569 ? >> (I checked the previous 3.0.2 version, and an empty enum was returned when >> resources are not found). >> > > Yep, see: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2629 > > Hope to do another maintenance release next week. > > -> richard > > best regards >> /pierre >> >> --000e0cdf1a3ceccf2c0491905e3a--