Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5045 invoked from network); 14 May 2010 10:20:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 May 2010 10:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27192 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2010 10:20:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 26347 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2010 10:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 26338 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2010 10:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:20:22 +0000 Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so1553734wyb.30 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BMIgzGmp0qhiMKlJp1gHMlVtWfHWmBRgA25dSCQasNo=; b=UO/JpYWSBHMKPZ5/g4R4tZIUYLh3SdCEGA/Fdl0wstWWghLCRATu39LuxF7cQgcfe+ K7fqiIokWXmqQxSTZwD5vpMxETpAZDjbnpowdyAQ+oBql0FAxdunIz4bqz24tcFj44CM +AN3hN6JrfSbsAJV++787zcADlIqUB3u9SxQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lgeJMMgS8GoxA2ykm+fHX83raffMBxnJBSBF9Db6M/fWVtomAYfShAY3IUnb3KBeu+ s9tLYUWq1AoOLVe5e/NqPW2jhaF0lSF9l7ADpMwvovGJJLMN0opaocGkk1SXb8KuYsy0 Matm69a+Ioa/Yij3/lVXb2n4hqzmw/vvr52v0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.170.199 with SMTP id p49mr715005wel.149.1273832402450; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.73.73 with HTTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 05:20:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP From: Guillaume Nodet To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fa4b8d9f86104868b37d1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367fa4b8d9f86104868b37d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Karaf has been brought into the Felix TLP nearly one year ago. Things have not been too bad, but I still see the karaf community as being very disjoint from the other felix community, as it looks that none of the existing felix committers did really get involved in Karaf. I really don't blame anyone, i think it's just that the interest are not the same (not sure where they actually diverge though). I don't really see what benefit Karaf would have in continuing being part of Felix, so I'd like to open the discussion about moving it to a TLP. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com --0016367fa4b8d9f86104868b37d1--