Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4989 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 13:30:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 13:30:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 21418 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 13:30:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 21376 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 13:30:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 21368 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 13:30:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 13:30:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.222.54.6] (HELO outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com) (67.222.54.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 13:30:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 27019 invoked by uid 0); 28 May 2010 13:30:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host118.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.118) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 May 2010 13:30:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=yY0VwTRZk1r+o/48Esy0NZrbU/uJzVg1D9VqQs94Xmy1/35jNFM3Tda3zSrNuJmINhE5Wm1AaANCwh87lnTOXgMp2p1iFOHLLBmIX032/sA1axLVsOZ0OBOhf/v2NLQg; Received: from clt-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([192.18.128.5] helo=heavyweight.local) by host118.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHzdn-0005PU-GR for dev@felix.apache.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 07:30:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4BFFC572.8090807@ungoverned.org> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:30:26 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1027:host118.hostmonster.com:ungovern:ungoverned.org} {sentby:smtp auth 192.18.128.5 authed with heavy@ungoverned.org} Question: Is a formal vote necessary to start this process or is our informal consensus enough? -> richard On 5/28/10 1:40, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > It seems there is a consensus to move Karaf as a TLP, at least amongst > people involved in Karaf (the other felix committers haven't really > expressed any opinion). > > I think the next steps would be to draft a proposed resolution to the board, > which would include: > * the project goal > * the project PMC (including the chair) > > In order to create an open community from the start, I'd like to invite > anyone with an Apache account willing to contribute to Karaf to raise hands > so that we can build this list. I don't think opening it wider for now > would be wise, but I do thing we should have a very low entry bar for > committership (but that can be discussed later). > > I'll try to come up with a proposal for Karaf's project goal asap, but > anyone is welcome to give it a try and propose some wording. > > FWIW, it would like the following, we just need to fill the XXXX: > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to a machine learning platform > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Karaf Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to XXXXXXX; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Karaf" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Karaf Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Karaf Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Karaf Project: > > * xxx> > * ... > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that XXXXX > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Karaf, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Karaf PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Mahout Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Felix Karaf sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Felix Karaf sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Felix Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:20, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > >> Karaf has been brought into the Felix TLP nearly one year ago. >> Things have not been too bad, but I still see the karaf community as >> being very disjoint from the other felix community, as it looks that none >> of the existing felix committers did really get involved in Karaf. I >> really >> don't blame anyone, i think it's just that the interest are not the same >> (not sure >> where they actually diverge though). >> I don't really see what benefit Karaf would have in continuing being part >> of Felix, so >> I'd like to open the discussion about moving it to a TLP. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> >> > >