felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Maven groupId question
Date Wed, 05 May 2010 15:38:29 GMT
Yes, you don't end up with 100s of jars in org.apache.felix,
so it's better categorized.

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 17:20, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote:

> I noticed while poking around Gogo that its Maven groupId is:
>
>    org.apache.felix.gogo
>
> While most other subprojects are:
>
>    org.apache.felix
>
> Apparently, Karaf also creates its own groupId. I guess I was under the
> assumption that all subprojects were using the same groupId. It doesn't seem
> necessary, even if you have multiple modules, since for example iPOJO has
> multiple modules, but still uses org.apache.felix.
>
> I realize the groupId doesn't really have much impact, but it does make it
> somewhat confusing to know which is the correct groupId to use for a given
> subproject. So, from that perspective it seems easier and more consistent if
> every subproject just used the same groupId. Are there any benefits of
> having separate groupIds?
>
> -> richard
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message