Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56724 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 55120 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 55082 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 55074 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [134.214.76.242] (HELO smtp.insa-lyon.fr) (134.214.76.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:07:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4385EF12EE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:07:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SMTP at INSA-LYON Received: from smtp.insa-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (criges14.insa-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEm05XfecwYd for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-bw0-f226.google.com (mail-bw0-f226.google.com [209.85.218.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sfrenot) by smtp.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D17B8F12CD for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so8631989bwz.27 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.135.82 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD07A05.3040703@ungoverned.org> References: <4BD07A05.3040703@ungoverned.org> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:07:34 +0200 Received: by 10.239.162.210 with SMTP id m18mr896711hbd.189.1271956054333; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some problems From: stephane frenot To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f5ae7cc9d8a30484d658dc --001485f5ae7cc9d8a30484d658dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I rarely ever build the entire trunk...this is for two reasons: > > 1. The build setup just sucks. > OOO, yes.. It should be modified to be standard... > 2. It is rarely necessary since most subprojects should only depend > on released versions so building for snapshots is typically not > necessary, so I just build what I need. > I agree, I do the same, but not my students... They are loosing hours rebuilding things that are not compiling, and I cannot let them alone at th= e bigginning. > Of course, I am not against improvements, however... > Do you think I can commit modification directly ? if I open a jira issue ? /stephane > -> richard > > /stephane >> >> > --=20 http://perso.citi.insa-lyon.fr/sfrenot work here : http://tinyurl.com/2ts4xf sleep here : http://tinyurl.com/33p2gt play here : http://tinyurl.com/3yarjz --- Stephane Frenot Universit=C3=A9 de Lyon, INRIA INSA-Lyon, CITI, F-69621, France --001485f5ae7cc9d8a30484d658dc--