Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org
 designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org;
	h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User;
	b=FDBzZAdR3X1oBwnjS1+n5PKx/qXzDtQe0LN0z2Y9qBvQp20C8GEvi1E+GP37T0apqISUnsrXTg2vP0/JXXmX5bK4Jre8f5Sf8+10Dl2hObOXNAalYyl7ncmMldeQHsnT;
Message-ID: <4BBDD751.7020602@ungoverned.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:17:05 -0400
From: "Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fragment-Host's bundle-version not being honored in 2.0.4
References: <28170716.post@talk.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <28170716.post@talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/7/10 16:41, jspeton wrote:
> According to this bug https://cwiki.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1795
> bundle-version support in Fragment-Host header should work as of 2.0.2, yet
> it is not being honored for me.
>
> Here is my situation:
> 1. Two bundle hosts, with the same symbolic name, but with different
> versions 1.6.1 and 1.6.2.
> 2. Two bundle fragments, with the same symbolic name, and with the same
> symbolic name fragment host from (1).  The bundle-version of the two
> fragments is 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 (they are kept in sync to avoid confusion).
>
> In other words, I am expecting that version 1.6.1 of the host will resolve
> the 1.6.1 fragment, and the 1.6.2 host will resolve the 1.6.2 fragment.
>
> What I am finding is that the 1.6.2 fragment is resolving to both the 1.6.1
> and 1.6.2 hosts.  I know the 1.6.1 class loader is correct, as is the 1.6.2,
> but using getResourceAsStream from either host always gets me the 1.6.2
> version.  Both bundle-version parameters are expressed as single versions,
> e.g. bundle-version="1.6.2", although I have tried "[1.6.2,1.6.2]" as well
> to no avail.
>
> Am I doing something wrong or is this feature still bugged?  Why is the
> 1.6.2 fragment in the classpath of the 1.6.1 classloader?
>    

What is the version range in your Fragment-Host header? If your 
fragments match both hosts, then the resolver will try to attach the 
highest version fragment to each host. This is correct. If you only want 
your fragments to attach to a specific host version, then your 
Fragment-Host header should only match that version.

-> richard

> Many thanks!
> Jean-Guy Speton
>
>