Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48751 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 13:32:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 13:32:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82323 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:32:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 82282 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 82274 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 13:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1255.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:32:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEFE29A0012 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2145453292.6491270819910916.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:31:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-995) JRE packages are exported with wrong version In-Reply-To: <654268290.1237731470420.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855385#action_12855385 ] Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-995: --------------------------------------- I have been looking into adding "uses" constraint information to the JRE packages too, although it is not clear if this will help the situation or not at this point. Regardless, one thing is clear is that the system bundle is not telling the truth about its constraints if it omits "uses" constraints. Regarding the version number, I still think it is a mistake to include the same version number for all JRE packages on every version of the JRE. This means there is never anyway to differentiate. However, we could just assign 0.0.0 with a qualifier, e.g., 0.0.0.jre-1.6 or something. > JRE packages are exported with wrong version > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-995 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-995 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Framework > Affects Versions: felix-1.4.1 > Environment: generic > Reporter: Sahoo > Fix For: felix-3.0.0 > > > Felix 1.4.1 exports JRE packages with a version equals to the JRE version. e.g., if I am using Java SE 6, then all packages are exported with version=1.6. This is incorrect. Most of the packages are versioned as per the JSRs they are defined by. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.