Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83404 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 09:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 09:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18545 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 09:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 18449 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 09:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 18441 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 09:33:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:33:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.227] (HELO mail-fx0-f227.google.com) (209.85.220.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:33:04 +0000 Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so333543fxm.28 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=tqtyLMk25qAOUEXnT43Ai6yqEFp2Ba7KRGf3mZU2WvU=; b=Ns4rpQ5wQpQyaGOIzufD+8qWEuv1ntaeiRWBV7bXnkoG7yIcUTiEVUqcR28JpjMGrU HjEEWWNFd2NUYNemdyOF6jwmGSCGSGlbJtYyYO+z6/YnTFAb+c12etr8jKqdJ4HH8gIO bAWrQQQWhKvos46vtth6D9ocvrfDTZLIEdXvs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mseA7Ij2nDoU9znQOU1enaqUDI3bxdF3vNUg8mpKzgBVYVeJatTAniHO3oTF6o0iZQ ANueuMxuq6KENo+3ym7PstLflUoou9NzPs/LVaryEyvDa8t1/WLtkKZlm3IDkvO5GTiA zvc2yRF+w2vlHBFBx22hBNE1l3LbcGpJdCIcQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.164.78 with SMTP id d14mr2661902fay.85.1268818363463; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:32:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Refactor bundlerepositorty and obr related code from maven-bundle-plugin ? From: Guillaume Nodet To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Both bundlerepository and maven-bundle-plugin contain similar code like the RepositoryImpl, BundleInfo (quite similar to the LocalResourceImpl from bundlerepository), repository xml parser, etc... I think it would make more sense to enhance the ones in bundlerepostiory and reuse those from the maven-bundle-plugin rather than keep the duplication. Thoughts ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com