Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4BAB4165.5060304@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:56:37 +0100
From: Arjun Panday <arjun.panday@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dev@felix.apache.org" <dev@felix.apache.org>
Subject: Re: OBR.resolve(NO_LOCAL_RESOURCES)
References: <4BA8D0BA.7070309@alcatel-lucent.com>
 <b23ecedc1003230916l12cd1eceic7ba460461e1f7c6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b23ecedc1003230916l12cd1eceic7ba460461e1f7c6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Guillaume,
> If you use the NO_LOCAL_RESOURCES flag, your resolution should not contain
> any local resources,
What you describe here is the normal behaviour of the resolver without 
any flag; and it was the whole point of JIRA:FELIX-692
What exact feature did you mean to implement with this flag?

/arjun

>> Guillaume (i believe this is for you),
>>
>> I'm still testing the new bundlerepository from the trunk..
>> I noticed recently that, when i use the NO_LOCAL_RESOURCES flag in the
>> resolver, all the local resources required by my resolution have a null URI.
>> My intent when using NO_LOCAL_RESOURCES is purposely to NOT ignore the
>> resources present in my resolver's framework and to extract a "pure OBR"
>> resolution, independant of the framework instance that computed it;
>> therefore i need all the computed resources along with their URIs with
>> respect to the OBR location.
>>
>> Can you please look into this? Do you agree with my interpretation of the
>> NO_LOCAL_RESOURCE flag?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Arjun
>>
>>      
>
>
>