Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Message-ID: <877496404.248261266028347862.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-2066) File Install fails to move fragment
 bundle into RESOLVED state
In-Reply-To: <1161348135.205941265892747847.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833291#action_12833291 ] 

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2066:
----------------------------------------

Yes, I agree, that is the way. You could obviously make it smarter by parsing the Fragment-Host header and only refreshing the corresponding hosts.

> File Install fails to move fragment bundle into RESOLVED state
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2066
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: File Install
>         Environment: Windows XP, Java 6, Equinox , File-Install 2.0.8
>            Reporter: Shrini Joshi
>
> The file-install will install the fragment bundle but fails to move it to resolve. The fragment bundle remains in INSTALLED state. 
> If we install it from equinox shell, then fragment bundle is installed and resolved correctly. 
> Can someone please comment ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.