Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38338 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2695 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 2625 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:59:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:59:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E8A234C4B1 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:59:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <69002597.386101266577167952.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-2104) Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser In-Reply-To: <253642770.368731266526768097.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835693#action_12835693 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-2104: ---------------------------------------- Yeah, I'm not thinking of embedding it. I've done some initial testing using a stax parser and woodstox underneath. The early tests shows a speed improvement > 7x, so it's really worth investigating. I need to try with the default sun stax parser. If perfs are not too bad, the easiest way would be to simply use the stax parse if available. It would use whichever implementation is available (hopefully woodstox has been configured) or the JVM one. > Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-2104 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Task > Components: Bundle Repository (OBR) > Reporter: Guillaume Nodet > > kxml is nice because it's small > We may want to check using faster parser if they are available while still keeping kxml as a fallback. > Woodstox is one of the fastest parser so we may want to see what's possible with it. > The main driver behind that is speed, so we want to measure the parsing time with kxml vs woodstox. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.