felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (FELIX-2104) Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser
Date Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:59:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835693#action_12835693

Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-2104:

Yeah, I'm not thinking of embedding it.
I've done some initial testing using a stax parser and woodstox underneath.
The early tests shows a speed improvement > 7x, so it's really worth investigating.
I need to try with the default sun stax parser.  If perfs are not too bad, the easiest way
would be to simply use the stax parse if available.  It would use whichever implementation
is available (hopefully woodstox has been configured) or the JVM one.

> Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FELIX-2104
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Bundle Repository (OBR)
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> kxml is nice because it's small
> We may want to check using faster parser if they are available while still keeping kxml
as a fallback.
> Woodstox is one of the fastest parser so we may want to see what's possible with it.
> The main driver behind that is speed, so we want to measure the parsing time with kxml
vs woodstox.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message