felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (FELIX-2104) Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser
Date Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:18:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835441#action_12835441

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2104:

>From my point of view, the main issues here are keeping OBR small, self-contained, and
usable across Java versions. I'm not knowledgeable about woodstox but a quick look appears
like it isn't too small (3x the size of the current OBR bundle), so just replacing kxml2 doesn't
look good. But, yeah, we could implement some sort of optional import-package approach, perhaps.

> Investigate the possibility to use a different xml parser
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FELIX-2104
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2104
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Bundle Repository (OBR)
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> kxml is nice because it's small
> We may want to check using faster parser if they are available while still keeping kxml
as a fallback.
> Woodstox is one of the fastest parser so we may want to see what's possible with it.
> The main driver behind that is speed, so we want to measure the parsing time with kxml
vs woodstox.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message