Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91274 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 12:59:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 12:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 82143 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 12:59:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 82058 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 12:59:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 81745 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 12:58:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AD32520.3040805@gmail.com> References: <4AD31A79.2070705@ungoverned.org> <4AD32520.3040805@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for a new NOTICE file From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > ...Thanks for bringing this up (again). The problem I have had for some > time now, is that our NOTICE files are not really consistent with the > legal intent of the NOTICE files.... FWIW, there's been some discussion about this recently at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62, which includes pointers to some related discussions threads. -Bertrand