felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: HttpService import
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:21:18 GMT
In that case we can just replace the current impl (keeping the name), 
but call it version 2.0.0, no?

-> richard

On 9/10/09 15:19, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
> To be cear: new http.jetty service should be a 100% dropin replacement for
> the old http.jetty service. I think it's pretty close right now since the
> actual implementation of new http.jetty bundle is almost the same code as
> the old one.
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<srs@x3m.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> The current http.jetty implementation is almost identical to the new
>> http/jetty implementation. So in my opinion it's not neccesarry to keep
>> implementing on the old one, unless it's some really good points in doing
>> so. So the folder could then be http (just use another version than
>> http.jetty).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sten Roger
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Felix Meschberger<fmeschbe@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import
>>> the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1].
>>>
>>> Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing
>>> the modules into a httpservice folder (we already have a http.jetty
>>> project, which is the Jetty Embedding HttpService implementation).
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>      
>    

Mime
View raw message