felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sten Roger Sandvik <...@x3m.com>
Subject Re: Felix HttpService improvement...
Date Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:38:07 GMT
Yes. Will fill it out on monday.

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Sten,
>
> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
> > Ah, ok. Actually my employer is paying for my involvement in projects,
> but
> > not the work done on this particular piece. Maybe I need to fax in a
> > Corporate CLA then?
>
> Hmm, ok. Maybe it would be better then -- it certainly does not hurt.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard S. Hall <
> heavy@ungoverned.org
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 8/28/09 16:30, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Sten,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers,
> >> MD5
> >>>>> checksum matches).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just two remarks:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  * The pom.xml should also have the license headers
> >>>>>    (this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  * there is a runner folder containing scripts and the
> >>>>>    pax runner library.
> >>>>>    This should probably not be included, right ?
> >>>>>    (again, I think we can start the process and just omit
> >>>>>    this directory when importing into SVN)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on
file.
> I
> >>>>> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email srs@xbm.com. Am
I
> >>>>> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of
> >>>>> getting this into Felix SVN.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Which will require Sten to fill out a Software Grant, which may need
> to
> >>>> come from his employer if it is actually the employer who is
> >> contributing
> >>>> the code.
> >>>
> >>> No, it does not need to be from my employer. Been coding this in my
> spare
> >>> time. It has been used at Enonic (my current workplace) in form of some
> >>> binaries. So a grant from Enonic is not neccessary. But will be happy
> to
> >>> provide one if you really need it.
> >> A Corporate CLA is only required if your employer pays your for working
> >> on Apache projects.
> >>
> >> But what we would probably need to be good for IP clearance is a
> >> software grant [1]. You may fax it to the same number as the ICLA.
> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> -> richard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  Regards
> >>>>> Felix
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Attached the source in the jira task (
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure
on what
> >>>>>> format
> >>>>>> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached
> a
> >> md5
> >>>>>> checksum for the package.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<srs@x3m.com>
> >>  wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall<
> >> heavy@ungoverned.org
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Rob Walker schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>   * Sten packages the source and attaches the package
to
> >>>>>>>>>     the issue and publishes a package checksum.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright
notices
> >> from
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix
Java
> file).
> >>>>>>>> Package
> >>>>>>>> renaming is not necessary at this point.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create
a
> >> tarball
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting
committer
> >> rights
> >>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled
in a
> >> seperate
> >>>>>>> vote?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    * We vote on accepting this submission
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>   * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form,
> >>>>>>>>>     sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h)
> >>>>>>>>>   * Add the code into the SVN
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive
this process.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Of course, I can help if needed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ->  richard
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  Regards
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job,
kudos.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy
with the approach
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>> code
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>  From our side, we can certainly run some
"real world"
> >> compatibility
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's
new service would
> >> be
> >>>>>>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether
thenew version
> >> breaks
> >>>>>>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If
it does, I'm sure
> >> it'll
> >>>>>>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually
not correct in
> the
> >>>>>>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll
be useful though
> to
> >> be
> >>>>>>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything
that might differ
> and
> >>>>>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>>>> application changes.  I'm happy to make time
to look at this
> next
> >>>>>>>>>> week.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing
Sten, we also
> >> need
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service
has served us
> >> pretty
> >>>>>>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have
cleaner and
> fuller
> >>>>>>>>>> solution
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -- Rob
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message