felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: Felix HttpService improvement...
Date Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:10:51 GMT
On 8/28/09 13:48, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
> Attached the source in the jira task (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what format
> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a md5
> checksum for the package.
>    

That's fine.

-> richard

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<srs@x3m.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall<heavy@ungoverned.org>wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Rob Walker schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following:
>>>>
>>>>    * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to
>>>>      the issue and publishes a package checksum.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from the
>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). Package
>>> renaming is not necessary at this point.
>>>
>>>        
>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball and
>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights so
>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate vote?
>>
>>
>>      
>>>
>>>     * We vote on accepting this submission
>>>        
>>>>    * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form,
>>>>      sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h)
>>>>    * Add the code into the SVN
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>        
>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process.
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-)
>>>
>>> Of course, I can help if needed.
>>>
>>> ->  richard
>>>
>>>
>>>   Regards
>>>        
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos.
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and code
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>>  From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility
>>>>>>              
>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be
>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks
>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll
>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the
>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be
>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and need
>>>>> application changes.  I'm happy to make time to look at this next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need
to
>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance?
>>>>>
>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty
>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller
>>>>> solution
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Rob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>          
>>      
>    

Mime
View raw message