Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org designates
 67.222.39.30 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org;
	h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User;
	b=p6PoBQCdLWUmedcdYgEA4+ZER+kq8AaIuAlJ+NjwRkH3KNUrdBMWGKdSeGMtrjcbnyO0KoFkQpDWCShMbBKnftPo2g8w4+Ye5iZ8l3shdYBoP7BcvrMmta8BtlupoShf;
Message-ID: <4A7344EE.3050907@ungoverned.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:24:30 -0400
From: "Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java Support in some of the Felix bundles
References: <4A7342D5.6010502@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A7342D5.6010502@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well, SCR wouldn't be one of those bundles. ;-)

I think we should only compile to higher byte code levels if necessary, 
but keep it as low as possible to maintain broader compatibility.

-> richard

On 7/31/09 3:15 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently we have a policy, that we compile everything (or most) to be
> acceptable by Java 1.3 VMs. While working on the R 4.2 support of
> Declarative Services I now and thought about whether we should excempt
> some bundles from this rule.
>
> This is just wild thinking and there is nothing concrete, not even a
> requirement. So if you think, we should stick with the "Java 1.3"
> policy, I am perfectly fine with it.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>