felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [karaf] Switching from gshell to gogo
Date Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:45:35 GMT
Yeah, I definitely would not like switch if we're not feature
equivalent (or mostly).

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 15:42, janstey<janstey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a lot of wins there for this move but I'm a bit worried about not
> having history or tab completion right away. Before those features made it
> into the ServiceMix Kernel, I found it VERY frustrating to use. Maybe they
> should be added before Karaf 1.0 is released?
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
> http://janstey.blogspot.com/
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
>>
>> I've been considering swithing karaf shell from Geronimo Gshell to Felix
>> Gogo.
>> The main reasons are:
>>   * Gogo is/will implement OSGi RFC 0142 to standardize the shell
>> (it's not yet a spec, but should be in the future)
>>   * Gogo should be able to be used at launch time to run the framework
>>   * Gogo shell syntax is more powerfull, in addition to pipes, it
>> supports closures, loops, if / then / else ...
>>   * lightweight: < 100 ko vs > 1 Mo for gshell
>>
>> The drawbacks are:
>>   * yet another change in the syntax (we've already changed it when
>> between 1.0.0 and 1.1.0)
>>   * some more work is needed as we're currently missing completors,
>> history, banner
>>
>> Feedback welcome
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-karaf--Switching-from-gshell-to-gogo-tp24301702p24306951.html
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message