Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47574 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 16:18:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 16:18:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 75130 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 16:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 75053 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 16:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 75040 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 16:18:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of filippo.diotalevi@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.186] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:00 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so1592888mue.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 09:17:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6ejR6SpfuLERtO0SrrSbK/N3ftiMlm8b1cpoTPTjjkI=; b=UEX1td/v9RTFCXOPO6T/tmIBXJ74dcIUC8b7dv3XM8VQ1GD1L+SiUQcIgchFiOkWtD fongozm40Ygp0vI8m8xby60nLNIWcW0TGn1XPkLIuabJKerGX0k0+Q3rWIiqoNKw8xLo xHkqjz2q7lpLYzbGhZ9XBniiS7iWbYNBKKPPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oOV8J6vF37pHuTb0OLQvJqDYtsy7X+F/jJmrJnDS6/wr2c4gUq65slqZx4TZIhKcEi MwHxaur+Y3JO4ciKLLbipekgM0oIoWAu8YqelJt8MHLxT+unCl1EQOCwqH4Lka/Ukz5b jTKAtp/Uo5Dg/s66UzjwVNDa/B8RlVNeNqkjw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.247.14 with SMTP id z14mr125204mur.70.1242749858956; Tue, 19 May 2009 09:17:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A12BE1F.10001@ungoverned.org> References: <86641CFA-FDA0-4659-993F-A39DF3E3A98D@apache.org> <4A12BE1F.10001@ungoverned.org> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:17:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Felix Commons page links From: Filippo Diotalevi To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > Yes, it would probably make sense, but in reality Felix Commons is probably > obsolete now because of such efforts and it has certainly lost its > leadership. We probably need to decide whether we just scrap it... > > Time for some Spring cleaning, perhaps. Looks like we will nuke osgi core > and compendium, what about commons? With the huge amount of bundles available in the Spring Enterprise Repository I don't see any reason to keep the Felix Commons. Is there anybody using it? -- Filippo Diotalevi