Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcculls@gmail.com designates
 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date
         :references;
        b=MKGg+nu20cKZbohFX5YNfcX4JbuIY8h+2DZMlwBRBmmTf0HIx0PKK2JRl/WT6rlRNf
         95Wm11pZHqZo5Y009qRlpY9fCEDPr1VKgscPDUctXyDdXOamnenJj7sVDJ2f3x/XwzKg
         A+ffr/5+bmW00Q+YsXTaw8aSfl+p1ASCfgN+c=
Message-Id: <EFDE8122-D0C4-42CA-9D6B-425DC6781A85@gmail.com>
From: Stuart McCulloch <mcculls@gmail.com>
To: dev@felix.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <4A0FCBC0.9020107@interfree.it>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 5H11a)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Felix UPnP Extra 0.4.0  and UPnP Tester 0.4.0 releases
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:12:06 +0800
References: <4A0C3B4A.5020801@interfree.it> <4A0C848A.9050007@ungoverned.org>
 <05451307-C828-4B3B-B15B-6ACA46CB50DF@gmail.com>
 <4A0D94BD.7070308@ungoverned.org> <4A0FCBC0.9020107@interfree.it>

On 17 May 2009, at 16:33, Stefano Lenzi <kismet@interfree.it> wrote:

> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> On 5/15/09 11:51 AM, Clement Escoffier wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a couple of issue to discuss before voting:
>>> - Source artifacts are missing
>> Aren't these source artifacts?
>>    http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases/org.apache.felix.upnp.extra-0.4.0/org.apache.felix.upnp.extra-0.4.0-sources.jar 
>>      http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases/org.apache.felix.upnp.tester-0.4.0/org.apache.felix.upnp.tester-0.4.0-sources.jar
>>> - The release doesn't use Nexus (but Stuart has provided a script  
>>> to turn around that for a former release of the framework)
>>>
>>> Are those issue blocking issue ?
>> Don't know. We should probably delete the old release document to  
>> avoid confusion.
>
> In fact, I have prepared the release by following the "old release  
> document". Do avoid further confusion I have add a Warning messages  
> on the wiki page containing the "old release document"

Great, thanks! I had originally planned to add a warning to the old  
process but I guess I skipped that step :)

> I will prepare a new release following the new instructions and  
> fixing the problem that you reported. Regarding the new instructions  
> I have a question: Has the parent pom of the releasing artifact be  
> the o.a.f:felix-parent:1.2.0 ?

correct, the artifactId was changed to felix-parent to reflect the  
contents and avoid people thinking this was the main distribution  
artifact

--
Cheers, Stuart

>>>
>>> On the release itself, nothing major :
>>> - Copyright year are not correct (should contain 2009)
>>> - The OSGi copyright years are not correct. It should be (2000,  
>>> 2007).
>>> - Your tester project notice should says that it "uses" code  
>>> developed at the ASF (you import  
>>> org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver....)
>> Yep.
>> -> richard
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Clement
>>>
>>> On 14.05.2009, at 22:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Minor issues:
>>>>
>>>>  * Copyright years should mention 2009 in NOTICE files.
>>>>  * Tester pom file says it depends on basedriver, so this  
>>>> dependency
>>>>    should be mentioned in the NOTICE file under "uses" on Apache
>>>>    software for completeness.
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/14/09 11:39 AM, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
>>>>> I would like to call a vote for the release of two UPnP project:
>>>>> - UPnP Extra 0.4.0
>>>>> - UPnP Tester 0.4.0
>>>>>
>>>>> The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and  
>>>>> MD5
>>>>> message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote to approve these release archives:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the releases
>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the releases (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ciao,
>>>>> Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
>>>
>