Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30018 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2009 14:02:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2009 14:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 70620 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2009 14:02:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 70538 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2009 14:02:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 70528 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2009 14:02:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:02:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org designates 67.222.53.8 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.222.53.8] (HELO outbound-mail-301.bluehost.com) (67.222.53.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:02:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 29099 invoked by uid 0); 24 Apr 2009 13:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host118.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.118) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2009 13:55:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=yK/oywajTKBHHQh6pzxh+Hp2PMXt08YnVjNBceLZ5sc5Xas+tczp4Hy6v1CDFjuONls/rJbTjENdScjsRmIbmW4gActM5I/2yFhRMuFJnHXQ26JkHW1r1xirrkeJ6Atz; Received: from tmo-100-183.customers.d1-online.com ([80.187.100.183] helo=heavyweight.local) by host118.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LxLyx-0008JW-HE for dev@felix.apache.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:02:23 -0600 Message-ID: <49F1C66C.5030804@ungoverned.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:02:20 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: [Karaf] Moving Karaf svn into Felix References: <487a994c0904240038j4620ff32haa60a009bb823340@mail.gmail.com> <487a994c0904240302x1a9c4217u5df4dfd7472fb8b4@mail.gmail.com> <49F19E4A.7080101@ungoverned.org> <49F1A2ED.9020204@apache.org> <49F1A8A8.9090906@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49F1A8A8.9090906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1027:host118.hostmonster.com:ungovern:ungoverned.org} {sentby:smtp auth 80.187.100.183 authed with heavy@ungoverned.org} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/24/09 7:55 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > And we are used to this already, everyone speaks about Apache iPojo, but > I've never seen Apache Felix iPojo. > That is completely false. Look at our subproject page: http://felix.apache.org/site/subprojects.html Everything there is Apache Felix XXX, including iPOJO. Ask Clement, I have corrected him on this numerous times when we first got started. It is either "iPOJO" or "Apache Felix iPOJO", but never "Apache iPOJO". If so, it is a mistake. Of course, I accept we can make a different decision in this case, but I just want to be clear that I have certainly tried to be precise up until now that our subprojects are part of Apache Felix. Otherwise, why don't we create org.apache.log, org.apache.ipojo, org.apache.http, org.apache.upnp... -> richard > Carsten >