Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73273 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 08:59:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 08:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 97195 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 08:59:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 97153 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 08:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 97143 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 08:59:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:59:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clement.escoffier@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.163] (HELO mail-fx0-f163.google.com) (209.85.220.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:58:53 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so16878fxm.22 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=/Cv6MYmtx4Hzlia9VFkT9q+fPis9LYPpf6mriv+NC5o=; b=vPNOsFCcDldGEpz+I99BHdG0vUedl+Ky1u+f3rfavYJs67HpsNW+a0IXjqlXJSAkHA Cn74O6Klx+MUJP05RvQMANYX1CoA1h62Z5NcKFE4oJ13GsHc2PISzHz5BzW3d/aVYxYW oH+xUf/fXZs88EUW2Z6FdWfHLI1glRKCGWwh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=oG60vHEqQROSnpwSbULjqnQ+riSdg8x5WVE1UerQLlUcD5+neP/xzKWb33Dj+7KSzE TG4xVWPm+LMd7NMEJ+OQD5x8eVRVnu+NjF0C4EsX2kqKTfrcbaZwARwYZdf8ae8qWO5I g4WhHeLhncEWeGZl4XwfpVfCPjWoqP2aucQr8= Received: by 10.102.228.10 with SMTP id a10mr425926muh.26.1239181112421; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.197? (91-64-153-193-dynip.superkabel.de [91.64.153.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm12385950mug.32.2009.04.08.01.58.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0840E707-590D-4BAC-BA30-72FE542627B4@gmail.com> From: Clement Escoffier To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Used license in the notice file when the import is added on packaging Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:58:30 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I have a strange case in my notice files. Imagine that you have a project. The code does not depends on the org.osgi.* packages. However, the binary of such project depends on these packages. the import was added during the packaging process. Do I need to include the OSGi license as a used license ? Regards, Clement