felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Karaf] Moving Karaf svn into Felix
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:34:29 GMT
I guess that's the reason why the use of functional / technology
related names are discouraged for apache projects.   This avoid a lot
of the possible clashes.  We don't have so many projects at Apache we
can't find new names yet ...

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 23:22, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> On 4/24/09 12:00 PM, peter royal wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> Anyway, my concern here is not over what we want to do, but what we
>>> should do from an Apache process perspective. I don't want Felix (the
>>> project) creating some firestorm by being seen as implicitly promoting
>>> subprojects to TLP.
>> Using Lucene/Hadoop as examples, their sub-projects don't necessarily
>> include 'lucene' or 'hadoop' in their package names.
>> So I think its entirely reasonable to have org.apache.karaf
> You may be right. Not that I like a lot of rules, but this is one that seems
> odd that there is not a rule for it. There is no guidance for avoid naming
> clashes among projects. Certainly odd.
> -> richard

Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA

View raw message