Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50829 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2009 16:45:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2009 16:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 86076 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2009 16:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 86044 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2009 16:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 86033 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2009 16:45:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:31 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcculls@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.157] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.46.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:45:24 +0000 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so358284ywr.10 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pI/jxm/BwXhqMalRRI9ms51SI07C7z9gYrIYuYViNXU=; b=KY8PPUMW/TSTG0Op+GJWI20Ozu95G5s74j78cZy4EUhiUk29EGIMIUZW8zGuwHInnE XxoWM7Do/u3mC3NRCTK3iXjefXgt1bbN0YR1WHh3rByoZ0hoDJ6gms25jKNkxiH0hFmU Izg9oqWy3Ac++qKGGTmFUWva2mbQ+jmQ5wqm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XuJ2OpCnWAP+OtTWoXiPjU+5X7rwnJtnUQfDp/fxbbEkDuaIpt+Go/pTORK9R8A0E2 s5QloOB0EIpgrNSuL4QiWflKonmwJl43dw93UKGsiM/3SrAlY9qd8Qf3ewyL3FtIYq5G PViCU+YIak7qFNxmnQbiReQ0SQ5xyAbvL8F4I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.46.3 with SMTP id y3mr2179319ybj.220.1235148304073; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <499EDD61.1030309@ungoverned.org> References: <8EA32C97-BB56-4D22-99A8-65DBA50A3B8F@luminis.nl> <499EDD61.1030309@ungoverned.org> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:45:04 +0800 Message-ID: <81f0d9c0902200845pcdf6befx30b43cde3846de36@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation From: Stuart McCulloch To: dev@felix.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e13ae8c3de04635c5ff4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151750e13ae8c3de04635c5ff4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2009/2/21 Richard S. Hall > I have been talking with Peter about this shell for a long time and would > definitely like to see it as a part of Felix. > definitely +1 for a common extensible shell > -> richard > > > Marcel Offermans wrote: > >> Forgot to mention, the donation can be found in FELIX-946: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-946 >> >> On Feb 20, 2009, at 17:25 , Marcel Offermans wrote: >> >> As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the >>> source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early drafts >>> for R4.2 (RFC-132). The idea is that this will be a shell that is >>> shared by all OSGi implementations. I would like to include it in >>> Apache Felix and maintain the codebase. What do you think? >>> >>> Greetings, Marcel >>> >>> >> -- Cheers, Stuart --00151750e13ae8c3de04635c5ff4--