Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49833 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2009 16:41:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2009 16:41:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 80838 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2009 16:41:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 80814 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2009 16:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 80803 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2009 16:41:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:41:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.191] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:41:02 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so971422fkz.6 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:40:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JOCfuYxw/NA4+F78PUtpbK0IjZCm5PkUuXJiX35NpHo=; b=HzRjYABbv5EgggD5tbIY9ExZ8rPS4akBZPRTfk7RXgOT9S5xyh7oDyfnAckH1yN3lK lk66nkhLdBTlQLiAk73XmyaGbz4sImlB27iGd5uOJbHaMFUa8hI03aRb1ndCFtpKcErX CYTl+6ec7aJnVw8VWvx208qtSajj5oKlCeFHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZsIiAE+t1xjYZnmKBXrSoZF6wKTYNFtO5+Xxpy5RMINvHxRh1O0f/QNhBFDcSOmCPX vGdPtCcCwXDEWGky7zdq2GOYkxxJw8ypo+kF6+IouPHjKI/y8Xq4hmeBzVvtMNAb4cXd QoT7KnXXKtKeMyDqbxKtqvnUw/85uctxUgEXA= Received: by 10.223.115.16 with SMTP id g16mr1150007faq.93.1235148041235; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:40:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from bslm-046.corp.day.com (cable-static-138-82.eblcom.ch [87.102.138.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z15sm5224106fkz.31.2009.02.20.08.40.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:40:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499EDD07.9030606@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:40:39 +0100 From: Felix Meschberger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] OSGi shell donation References: <8EA32C97-BB56-4D22-99A8-65DBA50A3B8F@luminis.nl> In-Reply-To: <8EA32C97-BB56-4D22-99A8-65DBA50A3B8F@luminis.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Marcel, Marcel Offermans schrieb: > As some of you might already have seen, Peter Kriens just donated the > source code for the new OSGi shell, as described in the early drafts for > R4.2 (RFC-132). The idea is that this will be a shell that is shared by > all OSGi implementations. I would like to include it in Apache Felix and > maintain the codebase. What do you think? I think this is a good idea, and would for accepting this contribution. IIRC we need to run the IP Clearance and would probably also have to convert the Java packaging, right ? Thanks to you and of course Peter for this. Regards Felix