Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76338 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2008 08:10:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2008 08:10:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 56453 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2008 08:10:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 56402 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2008 08:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 56390 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2008 08:10:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:10:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:09:43 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491A7234C1D7 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1407713501.1221206984284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:09:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Stuart McCulloch (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-721) NPE in FilterImpl.toString() In-Reply-To: <807259163.1221188624358.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630513#action_12630513 ] Stuart McCulloch commented on FELIX-721: ---------------------------------------- yes, that should work (need to update all the Operator sub-classes) and we should probably also mark the children member as volatile. > NPE in FilterImpl.toString() > ---------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-721 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Framework > Affects Versions: felix-1.0.4 > Reporter: Don Brown > > We see this NPE occasionally, probably 10% of the time on application startup: > [java] java.lang.NullPointerException > [java] at org.apache.felix.framework.util.ldap.Parser$AndOperator.toStringInfix(Parser.java:601) > [java] at org.apache.felix.framework.util.ldap.Evaluator.toStringInfix(Evaluator.java:184) > [java] at org.apache.felix.framework.FilterImpl.toString(FilterImpl.java:242) > [java] at java.lang.String.valueOf(String.java:2615) > [java] at java.lang.StringBuffer.append(StringBuffer.java:220) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.service.importer.DefaultOsgiServiceDependency.(DefaultOsgiServiceDependency.java:52) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.extender.internal.dependencies.startup.MandatoryImporterDependencyFactory.getServiceDependencies(MandatoryImporterDependencyFactory.java:69) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.extender.internal.dependencies.startup.DependencyServiceManager.findServiceDependencies(DependencyServiceManager.java:233) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.extender.internal.dependencies.startup.DependencyWaiterApplicationContextExecutor.stageOne(DependencyWaiterApplicationContextExecutor.java:248) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.extender.internal.dependencies.startup.DependencyWaiterApplicationContextExecutor.refresh(DependencyWaiterApplicationContextExecutor.java:172) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.context.support.AbstractDelegatedExecutionApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractDelegatedExecutionApplicationContext.java:136) > [java] at org.springframework.osgi.extender.internal.activator.ContextLoaderListener$2.run(ContextLoaderListener.java:746) > [java] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) > My first guess would be we are constructing a filter improperly in our Spring config, but the fact that it only happens some of the time is strange. If nothing else, it would be nice if this bit of code was a bit more defensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.