felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roger Martin" <waldensianspi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Remote Shell
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:45:15 GMT
Hi,

It depends on org.osgi.service.log?  I'm looking where this may be...


---------
Enter profile name: profile4

DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.ungoverned.osgi.service.shell -> 1.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.service.startlevel -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.apache.felix.shell -> 1.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.framework -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.service.packageadmin -> 0
ERROR: Error starting file:bundle/org.apache.felix.shell.remote-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT.j
ar (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 2: packa
ge; (&(package=org.osgi.service.log)(version>=1.3.0)))
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 2: package;
(&(package=org.osgi.service.log)(version>=1.3.0))
        at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._resolveBundle(Felix.java:1747)
        at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._startBundle(Felix.java:1610)
        at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1563)
        at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setFrameworkStartLevel(Felix.java:11
35)
        at org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:267
)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.osgi.framework -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.osgi.service.obr -> 3.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.apache.felix.shell -> 1.0

On 8/30/08, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Karl Pauls schrieb:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>>> To also record the original authorship of the code is just another such
>>>> reference case. But I see your point about confusion (I don't think it
>>>> is a
>>>> big issue, though). So what do you think of the following extension:
>>>>
>>>>    Contains code originally developed and contributed to the
>>>>    Apache Felix project by Dieter Wimberger
>>> Well, I would still not be in favor of this, since it is does not follow
>>> past precedent in Felix. We specifically started a contributor page for
>>> this
>>> very reason.
>>
>> I agree, the above statement would set a bad precedent and make us
>> end-up with a lot of this kind extensions that are not really needed.
>> The contributor page seems to be the place to note this kind of things
>> to me.
>
> Ok, I removed the attribution. The contribution is still noted on our
> contributions page [1].
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] http://felix.apache.org/site/felix-r4-contributions.html
>

Mime
View raw message