Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org
 designates 69.89.21.14 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org;
	h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User:DomainKey-Status;
	b=PJum5EHPXQM7b2N1eUAhHFAqSjFu5Z2f9NyC5bJWtyxBRebqNZxUvSi1RFZsXqTnmiF5/6czCY51QsComOrkz4ZIbTgzjXygTBoVidh+UnfuiV0hzqIXl2RF1m6VKilH;
Message-ID: <486AA10E.3030105@ungoverned.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:26:38 -0400
From: "Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: telnetd discussion
References: <594810D2-FD4B-4A77-A1AB-41D9BCB0F653@wimpi.net>
 <48648BA9.3060207@gmail.com> <65B23293-F767-4AF0-88A3-910FD09AB405@wimpi.net>
 <4869CD4E.8010104@gmail.com> <91812CB4-394C-4625-8CF5-1F787E09D156@wimpi.net>
 <486A7326.5060207@gmail.com> <486A96FD.3010807@imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <486A96FD.3010807@imag.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DomainKey-Status: no signature

Of course there are alternatives, but that is not really at issue here.

We want alternatives, so the question to answer is: Is a full-featured 
telnet bundle a good alternative?

I say, yes.

-> richard

Didier Donsez wrote:
> Hi all
>
> An alternative to telnet shell or ssh shell could be JMX over 
> "everything".
> I have commit a Shell mbean in my sandbox
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mosgi.util/
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mbean.shell/
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mbean.shell.felix/
>
> I have also one mbean for the KF shell and one for the Equinox shell.
>
> I'm currently refactoring the client side to remove the dependencies 
> with the JConsole (GPLv2 Classpath Exception).
> Here is a snapshot of the current JConsole client (in the VisualVM).
> http://www-adele.imag.fr/users/Didier.Donsez/dev/osgi/jconsole.osgi/jconsole.shell.png 
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Didier
>
>
>
> Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi Dieter,
>>
>> Dieter Wimberger schrieb:
>>
>>> If it is for a simple access to the Felix Shell Service that uses:
>>> shs.executeCommand(String line,PrintStream out,PrintStream out);
>>> then I don't see much sense to move this to Apache Felix, because 
>>> the simple remote shell does the job effectively and is much more 
>>> efficient. I think even if SSH is the argument we may simply try to 
>>> make a "SSH version" (using jaramiko).
>>
>>
>> I agree completely.
>>
>>>
>>> So let's collect good reasons, because these would also be the 
>>> foundation to argue an inclusion with/in the Felix PMC.
>>
>>
>> Agreed. My personal opinion is, that it would be cool for Felix to be 
>> able to provide such telnet. Is this enough ?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> PS: You CLA has been registered. Thanks.
>>
>>
>
>