Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87209 invoked from network); 7 May 2008 20:07:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2008 20:07:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 17873 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 20:07:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 17836 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 20:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 17825 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2008 20:07:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 13:07:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 20:06:16 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so282882nfc.20 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 13:06:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uzaCOGyhiziqsHbGfwCBZkW8s3kJJfwcnoImsbio7Yk=; b=HcLRustCvef2xaOrYCkI3esnh8wzwaLm+W0QJDmyaZMgXUn7DEPbD+uwnOS9Vyrr4CyVpphLlmFUlWDb87KlIMVn8bTIHlewz2vsCsnCmBA9IqzoX6swwyzQHwZW4uUwvoeZjgKHG3e3MpcUEmP1yKedPLh1zZLYTAnCfcntNeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=JMhuCkXfCHLWKExPZVJNZqhQ3tn8jL7WpwebIHbEcvLbNMGs05Y8yrpOWobRD9/6U2aflEicIwnR9W49JYZ7XwNOJjmqF673zD48sGlI2h5JEckjPtFNP9hca9x3uy88OSPc/BDVQhpjjU9cLqHlUIepnlFQ4gTg8RBG3xF/n2Q= Received: by 10.210.38.17 with SMTP id l17mr2374567ebl.50.1210190789485; Wed, 07 May 2008 13:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.123? ( [87.102.138.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j10sm4550073muh.2.2008.05.07.13.06.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 07 May 2008 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Moving the Sling Management Console to Apache Felix From: Felix Meschberger To: Felix Dev In-Reply-To: <1210189919.30079.164.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com> References: <1210189919.30079.164.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 22:06:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1210190786.30079.171.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-9.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI a paralell vote has been started on the Sling Dev list [3] to ask whether Sling would be willing to donate the console to Apache Felix. Regards Felix [3] http://markmail.org/message/ozbcbaevaxxqh5k3 Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Felix Meschberger: > Hi all, > > After an initial round of discussion and letting it almost be forgotten, > we should finally start to get this moving again. > > As noted in [1] the incubating Apache Sling project has a module - a > single bundle - which provides a Web Based Management Console. The base > bundle allows mainly for OSGi management such as bundle lifecycle > management, configuration, etc. But the console is in fact extensible > and more functionality may easily be plugged into it. > > Members of the Felix and Sling community met at ApacheCon in Amsterdam > and and came to the conclusion, that the Apache Felix project would be > the natural location for such a management console. Mainly because > people looking for OSGi stuff would turn to Felix and not primarily to > Sling. > > There is no release yet of the Sling Management Console and there are a > number of open issues [2], which should be fixed/implemented before a > first release of the console. Nevertheless the console is already usable > in its current state and therefore, I think we may just move it as is > and finish it in Apache Felix. > > So here is the vote. As always, it will be open for 72 hours and only > votes of Felix PMC members are binding (though anybody is cordially > invited to vote): > > [+1] Yes, move the Management Console to Apache Felix > [0] Don't care > [-1] No, leave it where it is > > Regards > Felix > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/j3vafwwzyli4zrmz > [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/component/12312091