Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38630 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 08:08:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 08:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 50636 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 08:08:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 50608 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 08:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 50599 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2008 08:08:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:08:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of adreghiciu@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.181] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:07:52 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b50so3042688pyh.30 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:07:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=e/kJ5uz2GVVyjcpBvoSQa7XyXZ4X5qpXC5RVCAHjj8Q=; b=KbIivh2FS8ViynP+2WGALp3M3XncViNmcnd0OLtjY4mNQKqa9jgKUKH04wmSIZ+DN7tNzBDESnVdD/ESkaVupq5UCNILFAGyZPbnfkx0awmbzOYm5BrlUKHzQSDr480Zt5leixQiVilVN+EqWXJrAd04F3yOfnxqAol5+ws7uxk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=BHzI628uQsYrmbomKTrDCG2cJEPvmo8q36SiTL7I7QWPTLIM8LSpRgS8/BDGklk0D35/jLStlXTF5/TJHPyLSbJ4ReygKe/1vO78ARXftqHRrySetI52nm2Ma/gsbC/gOPWY+hjiTyL2mSoaMoVxGEDA5fTRmnmTUfNewoWqW0k= Received: by 10.141.67.21 with SMTP id u21mr879980rvk.222.1202285278570; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.44.9 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:07:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <87eb8aee0802060007h6506ed8m15c93a5008594d0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:07:58 +0800 From: "Alin Dreghiciu" To: dev Subject: Status and future of bundle repository MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hy guys, Can you please give me some information about the status of rfc-122 and it's Felix implementation org.apache.felix.bundlerepository? The "problems" I see with the released 1.0.0 is that it uses System.out (shouldn't wise logging), discover resources fails with a NPE on an invalid filter syntax and is a kind of slow on parsing the repository xml even under not such a big repository like the one from osgi alliance (how this will scale on large repository or federation of repositories). I can raise jura issues and maybe some patches but it will be interesting to know first what the future looks like for OBR. And related, is there any other repository then the one from osgi alliance and the oscar one? As I see now the one from oscar does not have to many bundles and the one from osgi alliance looks like outdated and has corrupted data (invalid syntax) Kind regards, Alin Dreghiciu