Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59179 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2008 12:25:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2008 12:25:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 49254 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2008 12:24:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 49219 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2008 12:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 49210 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2008 12:24:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:24:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:24:19 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88311234C00F for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:24:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <575783524.1203251074542.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:24:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Karl Pauls (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-486) Felix release conting mixed bytecode: 1.3 and 1.4, we should compile all as 1.3 In-Reply-To: <23972330.1202509567424.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569693#action_12569693 ] Karl Pauls commented on FELIX-486: ---------------------------------- Stuart, if I understand you correctly, you say that starting with parent pom 1.0.2 we do target 1.3 bytecode - In other words, new releases and snapshots will do the same assuming they use the parent pom in version >= 1.0.2, correct? If so, lets just update everything to 1.0.2 and publish new snapshots. Next, we can release the artifacts you name above. Ultimately, the next release of Felix will then use the correctly compiled artifacts and trunk will use the correct snapshots for now. > Felix release conting mixed bytecode: 1.3 and 1.4, we should compile all as 1.3 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-486 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3 > Reporter: Stefano Lenzi > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytecode.jre13.r620538.patch, bytecode.jre13.r620865.patch, bytecode.jre13.vs.SNAPSHOT.r620865.patch, bytecode.jre13.vs.SNAPSHOT.r626008.patch > > > I found out that the following released project: > - shell-1.0.0 > - javax.servlet-1.0.0 > - org.osgi.core-1.0.0 > - shell.tui-1.0.0 > which are used by the felix-1.0.3 release are compiled for JRE 1.4, so we ended up with a felix released which is partially compiled for JRE 1.4 and for JRE 1.3. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.