felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stuart McCulloch" <stuart.mccull...@jayway.net>
Subject Re: Improved notice file
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:42:02 GMT
On 05/02/2008, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Up until now we have been including in the notice file our top-level
> dependencies. Is there some distinction we want to draw between "used"
> software that is actually embedded in the release versus "used" software
> that we depend on?


I thought that was covered by the 'Included Software' vs. 'Used Software'
sections.
(ie. embedded software from outside the project comes under 'Included
Software' ?)

-> richard
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what do you think if we start setting up our notice file like this:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/scrplugin/NOTICE
> >
> > (I just committed it to have a better base for discussion as quoting
> > the whole thing in an email is not very comfortable for discussing.)
> >
> > I splitted the notice file into three sections, one listening the
> > included software (and licenses), one section for the used software
> > (and licenses) and the third one for a summary of all licenses.
> >
> >
> > WDYT?
> > Carsten
>



-- 
Cheers, Stuart

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message