felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: Improved notice file
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:22:35 GMT
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 05/02/2008, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>   
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> Up until now we have been including in the notice file our top-level
>> dependencies. Is there some distinction we want to draw between "used"
>> software that is actually embedded in the release versus "used" software
>> that we depend on?
>>     
>
>
> I thought that was covered by the 'Included Software' vs. 'Used Software'
> sections.
> (ie. embedded software from outside the project comes under 'Included
> Software' ?)
>   

Ok, if that is the distinction...I guess I wasn't thinking of it that 
way...so, then it looks good to me.

-> richard

> -> richard
>   
>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what do you think if we start setting up our notice file like this:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/scrplugin/NOTICE
>>>
>>> (I just committed it to have a better base for discussion as quoting
>>> the whole thing in an email is not very comfortable for discussing.)
>>>
>>> I splitted the notice file into three sections, one listening the
>>> included software (and licenses), one section for the used software
>>> (and licenses) and the third one for a summary of all licenses.
>>>
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>> Carsten
>>>       
>
>
>
>   

Mime
View raw message