Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63584 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2008 16:40:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2008 16:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 12754 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2008 16:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 12717 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2008 16:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 12708 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2008 16:40:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:40:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:40:29 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D195571420D for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:40:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9339844.1199810433855.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:40:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-55) Look at migration to more recent Jetty version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12556937#action_12556937 ] Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-55: ---------------------------------------- > I did commit to my sandbox a simple file-based HTTP Service That would probably be a good thing in terms of "minimal" spec compliance. At the same time, we might make http.jetty as recent as possible: I am currently working on adapting to Jetty 6.1 (after rereading some comments in this issue). > Look at migration to more recent Jetty version > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-55 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-55 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: HTTP Service > Reporter: Rob Walker > Assignee: Rob Walker > Attachments: FELIX-55.patch > > > - Look at the issues and effort involved in migrating to a more recent version of Jetty. Most likely the latest Jetty6 would be considered, since this has architectural changes over Jetty5 and hence we'd be upgrading to the latest greatest Jetty internals and APIs > - Check backwards compatibility against existing (limited) set of cases in test bundle > - enlist help from others with bundles using HttpService for more extensive testing -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.