Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of heavy@ungoverned.org designates
 69.89.22.16 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <478B976B.1030008@ungoverned.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:10:03 -0500
From: "Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
References: <4781F935.1090301@apache.org>
 <81f0d9c0801070226l3e05800t465df4b051d89a72@mail.gmail.com>
 <ddeae1ee0801070514x67a290bgfe3a67e1751203d6@mail.gmail.com>
 <4783D00B.8070806@ungoverned.org> <4788DB91.5040807@interfree.it>
In-Reply-To: <4788DB91.5040807@interfree.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stefano Lenzi wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. I know that we have almost released the 
> artifact, but I want to clarify that my idea wasn't to change the 
> source but only to packaged them in way such that the artifact's user 
> may distinguish between different OSGi profile (CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 
> and OSGi/Minimum-1.1) and version. Also I would like to use the same 
> version number used by the OSGi Specification, so in our case 1.1.0 
> instead of 1.0.0.

Sounds reasonable...for the release, however, we only need the 
foundation profile, so we can probably just go with that, but in the 
future we can look into it. Please come up with a proposal.

> The org.osgi.foundation could be also used for checking during the 
> compilation phase which bundle are require only the EE defined by OSGi 
> and which bundle require standard JRE.

Yes, I would definitely like to do this...we have talked about it 
before, but I am not sure anyone knows how to modify our pom file to 
make it happen.

-> richard

>
> Ciao,
> Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
>