Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91867 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2007 00:57:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2007 00:57:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 68318 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2007 00:56:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 68283 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2007 00:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 68274 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2007 00:56:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:56:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.119.192.3] (HELO mx1.isti.cnr.it) (194.119.192.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:58:53 +0000 Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3 #31408) id <01MLN72VTVKW9PMSIA@mx.isti.cnr.it> for dev@felix.apache.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:54:39 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([151.23.182.246]) by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3 #31251) with ESMTPSA id <01MLN72UPQ5A9OE84X@mx.isti.cnr.it> for dev@felix.apache.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:54:37 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:54:45 +0200 From: Stefano Lenzi Subject: maven-obr-plugin: Some questions To: dev@felix.apache.org Message-id: <46F467D5.8050309@interfree.it> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) X-INSM-ip-source: 151.23.182.246 Auth Done X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, I have some questions about the maven-obr-plugin: - Should we keep the sandbox word in the package name? I think we can rid of it. - Should we replace PathFile class with FileUtils from plexus-util artifact(http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils/apidocs/org/codehaus/plexus/util/FileUtils.html) or with java.net.URL? IMHO we should remove it order to avoid code-duplication. - Why in the repository goal does the plugin look for obr.xml file? Which is the difference between obr.xml and repository.xml? Ciao, Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi