felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: Provisoning system
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:44:14 GMT
Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
> That's why I also asked. Are there plans to do that in Felix. As if there
> are not maybe we will start something like that at OPS4J. And will be a
> waste of energy to do more implementations of the same processor.

Well, we don't have too many plans since we haven't even officially 
voted on accepting the donation yet. However, assuming it passes, then I 
would expect that we would try to build a community around it here at 
Felix like all of our subprojects.

-> richard

> Alin
> On 9/28/07, Marcel Offermans <marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
>> Yes, it would be great if we as a OSGi community could develop more
>> different resource processors. The concept is really powerful, so it
>> would be great to have processors available for things like
>> configurations, driver repositories, etc.
>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 20:34 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> IIRC Marcel initially said, that there is not a Autoconf
>>> implementation
>>> yet part of the donation. But we at Day are very interested in the
>>> Deployment Admin (in fact having considered building an implementation
>>> at the time Marcel first annonced his plans) and so we already decided
>>> that we will do (or participate in the development) of this spec once
>>> the Deployment Admin has been donated.
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>> Am Freitag, den 28.09.2007, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Alin Dreghiciu:
>>>> Marcel,Will the donated implementation be inlude also Resource
>>>> Processors
>>>> beside the Deployment Admin implementation. As for example an impl of
>>>> Autoconf Resource Processer?
>>>> Thanx,
>>>> Alin
>>>> On 9/28/07, Marcel Offermans <marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 10:56 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>> Basically, I'm thinking about an OSGi service that would use a
>>>>>> simple
>>>>>> API to detect changes and load a new configuration (through ldap,
>>>>>> http, jcr, or whatever).  This configuration would include the
>>>>>> list of
>>>>>> bundles to install, and OBR would be used to download / install all
>>>>>> the dependencies.  Does it make sense ?
>>>>> I added some comments to the issue you referred to. Basically, the
>>>>> Deployment Admin spec already covers a lot of your requirements.
>>>>> We're expecting a donation of an implementation to Apache Felix soon
>>>>> (probably this weekend).
>>>>> Greetings, Marcel

View raw message