Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83748 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2007 10:10:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2007 10:10:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 47729 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2007 10:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 47653 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2007 10:10:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 47629 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2007 10:10:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:10:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.97.245.151] (HELO smtp151.iad.emailsrvr.com) (207.97.245.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:10:17 -0700 Received: by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: marcel.offermans-AT-luminis.nl) with ESMTP id 7D4B2623C0F for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:09:56 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <46A5CAE8.3060005@apache.org> References: <46A5CAE8.3060005@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcel Offermans Subject: Re: Releasing Commons Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:10:00 +0200 To: dev@felix.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Carsten, On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:48 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > With these changes I would like to release the commons parent pom, > followed by the bundles and then call a vote on all these artifacts. > > If noone objects (lazy consensus...) I'll go ahead in the next days. First of all, don't take this the wrong way, but I thought that only our release manager could call a vote for releasing artifacts? I happen to know he's on holiday for the next two weeks. Furthermore, we still are in the middle of releasing the framework itself, so I would suggest we include these artifacts in the next build. Richard already mentioned wanting to do an 1.0.1 soonish, so together with these artifacts that would make a good second release. Greetings, Marcel