Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57929 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2007 17:59:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2007 17:59:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 60760 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 17:59:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 60527 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 17:59:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 60517 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2007 17:59:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:59:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.208.4.195] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (74.208.4.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:59:47 -0700 Received: from [24.180.252.202] (helo=heavy.glastender.com) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp8S-1I7xW93L9d-0002th; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <469276B9.4010808@ungoverned.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:56:09 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: bundle digital signature validation for Felix References: <1183983155.4692263346b54@webmail.insa-lyon.fr> <46923771.9070807@ungoverned.org> <1183990595.469243431f269@webmail.insa-lyon.fr> <46924736.2090002@ungoverned.org> <487a994c0707091006t41ebf931m18b524aebdfb3d37@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <487a994c0707091006t41ebf931m18b524aebdfb3d37@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+sUTjkPi6u7sM5nXJaynD03zgsls3ShL7ajgl yI2Aety09z8K6VDO2V2z9y7lU7POoytr+U+gObNcNGnMtSHj4q 3tf8MwhFurdFoKhHo2N6joLY6LBmlDy X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Karl Pauls wrote: > As I said previously, I'm going to look into the patch and write a > proposal how to integrate it as soon as I find the time. Right now, > I'd first want the 1.0 release out of the door - hence, please be > patient for a little longer. > > regards, > > Karl > > p.s.: As Rick suggests, it can't hurt to get an ICLA on file until I > can look into your patch (and no, you can not "commit this via > Stephan" - you wrote it, so we need an ICLA and probably a grant from > you). Stephane tells me the Pierre was listed on the initial CCLA and that Pierre will also send an ICLA shortly...so, I think we are in good shape now. With these two things on file, then it will be possible for Stephane to commit things for Pierre, but it should probably be done via JIRA, much like I did for Clement and iPOJO. However, for this particular contribution, Karl will need to figure out how best to merge it. Thanks, Stephane and Pierre. -> richard > > On 7/9/07, Richard S. Hall wrote: >> Pierre Parrend wrote: >> >> Pierre, do you have an ICLA on file at Apache? >> >> >> > >> > not yet. I can make one if necessary, or simply commit my code through >> > Stephane. >> > >> >> I think Karl will need to look into the patch to see how to incorporate >> it into the trunk, no matter what. However, it would probably be >> worthwhile for you to submit an ICLA, since it declares that you are >> willing and able to contribute to Apache projects. Karl will have to >> follow up with any specifics regarding merging this into the trunk. >> >> -> richard >> >> > pierre >> > >> > >> > >> >> -> richard >> >> >> >> Pierre Parrend wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello all, >> >>> >> >>> I have posted my implementation of the security layer for Felix >> on the >> >>> >> >> jira: >> >> >> >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-22 >> >>> >> >>> do you (mostly Karl and Richard) want to have a look at the >> patch, or >> >>> >> >> should I >> >> >> >>> integrate the patch directly in the subversion 'trunk' ? >> >>> >> >>> let me know what do you prefer, >> >>> >> >>> best regards, >> >>> >> >>> Pierre >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > >> > >