Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72587 invoked from network); 4 May 2007 17:45:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2007 17:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90312 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2007 17:45:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 90288 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2007 17:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 90276 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2007 17:45:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2007 10:45:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.208.4.194] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (74.208.4.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2007 10:45:44 -0700 Received: from [24.180.252.202] (helo=heavy.glastender.com) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKpCa-1Hk1qM2BXW-0007gh; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:45:24 -0400 Message-ID: <463B70F4.2010502@ungoverned.org> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:44:20 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: UPnP bundles References: <463B665D.9040607@ungoverned.org> <463B6FE5.70204@isti.cnr.it> In-Reply-To: <463B6FE5.70204@isti.cnr.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19uJCo5fH1XAB1LmVjkBHXw1a/kfisjPuI0ydO nc830NQm7xCft1heZydfb4zLySVWtQt8nnQUTel149BkTTeCLg BfcPxHCkIU7psr+iutraXzf5ns9SRMS X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Francesco Furfari wrote: > > Richard S. Hall wrote: >> The UPnP bundles were causing my build to fail (as pointed out to me >> by Stephane), so I commented them out of the main pom file. Once the >> issue is resolved, we need to uncomment them. > > Sorry to which bundles are you referring to? > In the trunk there aren't dependencies between UPnP and MOSGi > ... and actually they are not commented !! > Are you talking about my sandbox? I tried to do a clean build of the trunk and I got an error which says that it could not resolve a dependency for one of the UPnP bundles...I don't remember which. It looked like the dependency was on 0.1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT of the maven-osgi-plugin, but I hadn't heard of such a version. Clear your .m2/repository and try to build from scratch using "ant" in the trunk and see what happens...that is what I did. -> richard > > francesco > >> >> Two questions about the pom: >> >> 1. MOSGi has a dependency on Java 1.5 which causes the build to fail >> under 1.4. Can we put MOSGi into a profile that only gets build on >> > Java 1.5? >> 2. Is there a way to modify the pom file so that the build does not >> stop if one of the modules fails? Would this be a better approach? >> >> -> richard