Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of hedhman@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender;
        b=OFzR65OWVuFJXM98iI9p7XiwGiYDm/wAtGLvoHEuT7AV9oXhFxnkPtIAZbxVEnA4APeGyjz1asowTLg2E6Ti2VqpRVQBFGZSEQWHd8acCFhuR7jkZos2pe22cVQu63uC05Tg4gOP4s0IAmT6zWaprpiRG4pxVwVeBp65Sx/qv+M=
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
Organization: Private
To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 101.6.4 of R4.1? Service Compendium
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:01:40 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <46233566.5090002@oclcpica.org>
In-Reply-To: <46233566.5090002@oclcpica.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704162201.40873.niclas@hedhman.org>
Sender: Niclas Hedhman <hedhman@gmail.com>

On Monday 16 April 2007 16:35, Dale Peakall wrote:
> This message from BJ Hargrave:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/osgi-dev@www2.osgi.org/msg00201.html refers
> to section 101.6.4 of the specification.  This doesn't appear in my
> version of the service compendium so I assume its a 4.1 thing?  Although
> as far as I was aware 4.1 only affected the core specification.  Anyway,
> it's going to be difficult to update the LogService implementation
> without knowing what it's supposed to do.  Can someone point me in the
> appropriate direction.

And the issue was;

 The text is written in a way that make it look like the Log Service is
 expected to send the events via the Event Admin service (if present).

The proper text should indicate that;

 The Event Admin service (if present) must register with LogReaderService
 and send the log events as standard Event Admin events.

So, if you implement LogReaderService and do nothing regarding the Event 
Admin, then you are doing the right thing.


Cheers
Niclas